Reader's Response Draft
In the article “Use of cladding in buildings here have grown in
recent times: Experts” from Faris Mokhtar, states that although there are
benefits of cladding on a building, cladding is still a fire hazard.
Mokhtar (2017) states that the usage of cladding has shown to
provide many benefits for the building. According to Assistant Professor Fadeyi
(2017), cladding has shown to benefit in the reduction of energy consumption
and increases the sustainability of the building. According to Assistant
Professor Budig (2017), he mentions that Singapore practices another style of
cladding which enhances the shade of the building.
However, usage of cladding has been contributing in the rapid
spreading of fire as it endangers the fire safety in the building as the oxygenation
could escalate the fire (Mokhtar, 2017). According to Mokhtar (2017), cladding
may have contributed to the fire that struck the Grenfell Tower, which led to
multiple fatalities.
Although there are strict regulations regarding fire safety, there
are existing buildings in Singapore which fail to meet the guidelines. As the
fault lies within construction, a clearer process should be implemented to
ensure proper installation of cladding.
Despite the strict fire safety regulations imposed in Singapore
along with the governance from BCA, there are existing buildings in Singapore
with cladding that failed to meet the set guidelines. From the article “36
buildings may have combustible cladding that doesn't meet safety standards;
police investigating”, (Loh, 2017), it has been reported that 36 buildings were subjected to
scrutiny, out of which 14 building were found to have cladding which failed to
comply with the class ‘0’ regulations. These 14 buildings evidently show that
the strict regulations and governance were unable to oversee the entire
spectrum of the process.
Reported in the article “How did cladding woes happen despite
layers of checks?”, (Ng, 2017), several parties were involved in the construction process,
with checks done by 6 different parties throughout the construction process.
However, even with the stringent checks, the material used was found to be
non-compliant. From the article, it was found that the main cause for the
non-compliance was directly from the source material, where the main material
used for cladding was mixed with another material, which was not graded
compliant.
A change in the construction process will be able to resolve these
underlying issues. By having one main principal architect to oversee the entire
construction process from the birth to completion of the cladding helps provide
consistency through monitoring if there are any changes to the material. With
certification at every check conducted by the various parties with
acknowledgement from the main principal architect, ensures that there will be
no compromise to the material. Even though this incident occurred due to the
fault of a distributor, a change to the process should still be implemented to
improve the existing system.
References:
http://www.todayonline.com/singapore/use-cladding-buildings-here-have-grown-recent-times-experts
http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/36-buildings-may-have-combustible-cladding-that-doesn-t-meet-9153588
http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/distributor-placed-two-models-of-cladding-in-one-stock
Comments
Post a Comment